How does iGRCs support this work?
Design relevant questions
Configure assessments and checklists around the activity, requirement or control being reviewed. Establish criteria appropriate to the intended use.
Connect answers with support
Retain documents or links alongside the related records. Make it clear which information supports the response being considered.
Review gaps and follow through
Use findings and actions to address incomplete information or weak controls. Bring the updated evidence into subsequent reviews.
How does an assessment response differ from supporting evidence?
An assessment response records a person’s answer or judgement. Supporting evidence provides information that can be examined to evaluate it. A reliable review considers relevance, scope and currency rather than assume that any attachment proves the answer.
Which requirements are relevant?
Assessment criteria may reflect policies, contracts, management systems or relevant legal obligations. Define who reviews the evidence and what is sufficient for the particular purpose.
Frequently asked questions
Can assessments use our own questions?
Yes. Configurable checklists and assessments support criteria relevant to your organisation’s processes.
Can evidence be reused?
Relevant documents and records can inform several reviews. Each reviewer should confirm that the material is appropriate and sufficiently current for their assessment.
See iGRCs in action
Discuss your current process, the people involved and the evidence you need. We will demonstrate the relevant capabilities and explore an appropriate configuration.